How world leaders were fooled into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
Posted on: Monday, February 6, 2017 CommentsThere’s shocking evidence that the organization which is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that fabricated global warming facts.
According to a high-level whistleblower America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.
Also, according to the report the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected.
Dr John Bates (the whistleblower), a top NOAA scientist with a flawless reputation, has shown undeniable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.
His vehement objections to the publication of the incorrect data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.
In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation - in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.
Official delegations from America, Britain and the EU were greatly influenced by the false NOAA study as they hammered out the Paris Agreement - and committed advanced nations to sweeping reductions in their use of fossil fuel and to spending £80 billion every year on new, climate-related support projects.
As it turns out, the climate crime has disturbing echoes of the ‘Climategate’ affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists clearly suggested they had manipulated and hidden data.
Read more at: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/
Source: dailymail.co.uk
Add Comment
If you already have an account, please LOGIN.
If not, you may consider creating on. It’s FREE!
» Login
» Sign up