Climate Fraud Exposed - The Truth about CO2: It Doesn't Rise Up, Trap and Retain Heat


It’s all a lie - carbon dioxide (CO2) is an alleged ‘well-mixed gas’ also alleged to reside in sufficient quantities high in the atmosphere to cause global warming (via the so-called greenhouse gas effect).

Here’s the first damaging fact to the theory: CO2 is in fact a heavy gas. It is not ‘well mixed’ in the air as per the glib claim. This heavy gas thus struggles to rise and soon falls back to earth due to its Specific Gravity (SG). Real scientists rely on the SG measure which gives standard air a value of 1.0 where the measured SG of CO2 is 1.5 (considerably heavier). Thus, in the real world the warming theory barely gets off the ground.

Climate Fraud Exposed – The Truth
    about CO2: It Doesn’t Rise Up, Trap and Retain Heat

The truth is that most of what we have been told about the greenhouse gas mechanism is false.

James Moodey wrote an excellent debunk of CO2 pseudo-science. Here’s what he says:

"Proponents [of the greenhouse gas theory] point to scientist John Tyndall for postulating what we now call global warming in his 1861 paper published in "Philosophical Transactions". Tyndall’s experiments methodically measured with an electronic galvanometer, the relative heat absorption of various gases, gas vapors and even a few solids. He proved that they absorb heat in the order listed.

Generally, the larger the gas molecule (compound gases), the more heat they absorb with the most heat absorbed by olefiant gas (ethylene). Although he does not mention carbon dioxide, it might absorb about a third of that amount. He discovered that that these gases absorb less heat as their pressure rises, so he measured at extreme low pressures.

At one point, he generalizes that gas vapors, such as aqueous vapor, absorb roughly 13 times more than dry gases. Solids absorb even more heat. He notes that gases cool in proportion to the absorption with large molecule gases taking longer to cool. Tyndall leaps a bit with this concept when he hypothesizes the affect on our atmosphere by stating, "to account for different amounts of heat being preserved to the earth at different times" – which we attribute to global warming."

There is no doubt what he measured exists, but nowhere in John Tyndall’s paper does he add the element of time. Yes, some gases absorb heat, but for how long? If you ask any climate ‘scientist’ how long CO2 traps heat they are unable to tell you. They certainly can’t claim Tyndall "settled" it.

Their goal is to convince you that CO2 is trapping heat (like a greenhouse) but they don’t tell you how much and for how long. Actually, the only scientist to test CO2 absorption/emission in the open atmosphere is Professor Nasif Nahle (Monterrey, Mexico).

In fact, have a look at any climate 'science' publication explaining how they quantify and explain their mechanism of carbon dioxide’s 'heat trapping' in the climate and you will only read about radiation effects, nothing at all on those essential laws that chemical science experts rely on. Anyhow, a greenhouse works by blocking out cooling convection, not by trapping radiation.

And the greenhouse gas theory is all about radiation. However, radiation is not the main method of heat transport in a gaseous environment like earth’s atmosphere. It is convection and conduction that carry heat around the system. No wonder climate computer models actually fail.

Read more, at:


Image Source:

Add Comment

Posting comment as guest.
If you already have an account, please LOGIN.
If not, you may consider creating on. It’s FREE!

» Login
» Sign up